There really is no rational explanation for Caroline Spelman's decision to allow two test culls of badgers with the hope of limiting bovine TB, other than a desire to 'do something'. She might as well authorise beating squirrels to death with hammers in the hope that it might prevent another foot and mouth outbreak. Or why not electrocute a swan, see if that helps prevent bird flu. My only guess is that Spelman is trying to draw attention away from her 'let's sell off all those useless forests to the highest bidder' plan last year, by coming up with even more stupid and bovine concepts.
Cull me if you think you're hard enough! |
The science, if you can call it that, goes like this. Badgers have TB, cows get TB, therefore the badgers give the cows TB, so if we kill all badgers, the cows won't have TB. Except they've tried this in Ireland to no great effect; even the best case scenario suggest badger culls would only reduce bovine TB by 15%.
You might remember during the bird flu epidemic, swans and other wild birds were blamed for the contagion's spread. Then of course, it turned the real cuprit was dodgy practises in the intensive farming and meat processing trades. Psyschologists called this phenomenon projection, where you absolve your own feelings of guilt and shame by identifying those faults in others.
Ask yourself a simple question: which is more likely to be cause of chronic disease in British cattle? Is it badgers roaming in a small area or driving cows all over the UK for sale and then slaughter? Or indeed ask the broader question, is it in fact modern, intensive farming that causes disease in the first place?
The farmers could vaccinate their herds against TB, but it's expensive so they won't. Better to get the government to pay for a badger cull or as Bernard Matthews did, when you start an epidemic, get the taxpayer to pay the bill for damages.
The healthy countryside |
If the logic of the badger cull is that we should remove threats to British industry by whatever means necessary, the NFU ought to be in the crosshairs. No badger ever cost the nation billions through its own greed and foolishness.
What's the problem with cows having TB? No, seriously, why do we care? Well, the reason is that in 19th century, before pasteurisation, it was a health problem - but it's not any longer!
ReplyDeleteAnd dig this: The genetic sequence of [TB] tells a number of tales including that humans probably gave cows their form of "bovine" TB, rather than (as had previously been suspected) the other way around. Sources: - Hershkovitz I, Donoghue HD, Minnikin DE, Besra GS, Lee OY, et al. 2008 Detection and Molecular Characterization of 9000-Year-Old Mycobacterium tuberculosis from a Neolithic Settlement in the Eastern Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 3(10): e3426 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003426 referred in http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/news-archive/news/1498/